The same example of any behavior can be used as evidence of good character or questionable character - it’s all subjective. It’s only human to feel like we can sense a murderer, but do humans have that capacity? “Can you tell - really - can you tell if someone has a crime like this in him?” asked Koenig. Amateur sleuths will be disappointed that rather than evidence, we get debate about how we can tell if someone is capable of murder. This week’s episode might be the weakest yet, because there is no new evidence presented. READ MORE: Obsessed with “Serial?” You’ll Love These Documentaries The Newest Evidence Does that make him a killer? We finally get a sense of Adnan’s frustration about how he’s been portrayed in the podcast - one moment, he feels like Koenig is his savior, the next, his executioner.Īnd really, how would any of us fare if a journalist began to dig into our teenage behavior, and interview former middle school and high school classmates about our personality and recount the times where we broke the law by shoplifting, drinking underage or smoking pot? Does any of that have any relevance to this specific crime? Is someone who steals money from a mosque more likely to be a killer? Is it evidence of bad character? But even then, rumors abound, with one person asserting that he stole as much as hundreds of thousands of dollars, which Koenig finds not to be the case.īut as Adnan himself points out, he has always admitted that he stole money from the mosque. Though Koenig says callers have informed her that Adnan has done bad things in his past, the only wrongdoing she can confirm is that he stole donation money from his mosque during the summer before 8th grade.
Serial podcast episode 7 season 1 transscript for free#
Subscribe now for free wherever you get your podcasts.Koenig speaks to people within the Muslim community in Baltimore, who generally all agree that Adnan is a “good guy” even though some accuse him of being duplicitous or even a psychopath (but still a “good guy!”). You can check out more about Hormonal on /hormonal. So join me, as we talk about the research, the ethics, and the cultural myths, around hormones. Rhea Ramjohn: Hormonal is brought to you by Clue, the period tracking app and menstrual encyclopedia. Vitzthum : So this required that I collect over 10,000 samples of saliva, over the course of two years, and God knows how many gallons of pee. Rhea Ramjohn: And, scientists on the ground about how their research is fueling a new understanding of how hormones nudge and drive us. Katrina Karkazis What they do is a gynecological exam to look at the size of the clitoris, and in many ways this must sound utterly ridiculous, like, you know, there's no such thing as clitoral weightlifting. Martie Haselton : If we rethink it in that way, then this is no longer premenstrual syndrome. Rhea Ramjohn: And hear from writers, who examine and challenge long established medical and scientific ideas. Katrina Karkazis : So as early as the 1930s, 1940s, there were these ridiculous things called certificates of femininity, and you had to be issued one in order to compete. You know you have two testes, why not three? Randi Epstein : The gland business was huge. Rhea Ramjohn: We’ll talk to historians on the evolution of endocrinology. Martie Haselton : The idea that many people have, that being hormonal, means that we've like, gone a little crazy, is I think backwards. And this season on Hormonal, we’ll focus on just that: hormones. Brought to you by Clue.Įach week, I, your host Rhea Ramjohn, will have experts on the show to break it all down for us. Rhea Ramjohn: Introducing Hormonal: A podcast about how hormones shape our world. We're talking like one grain of salt thrown into the ocean, and it has a huge impact. Randi Epstein : When we talk about hormones, we're not talking like a cup of sugar amount.
0 kommentar(er)
